CDD Fellow Proposes Concurrent Voter-Party Registration to Replace Delegate Primaries.

Current Affairs

ELS: MBN360 NEWS

Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare, legal scholar and CDD-Ghana Democracy and Development Fellow, has proposed a system of concurrent voter and party registration as a potential replacement for Ghana’s delegate-based primary elections, following the Supreme Court’s declaration that such systems are unconstitutional.

Professor Asare outlined his proposal in written commentary addressing what should come next after the landmark ruling. He opened his remarks by acknowledging that while the Supreme Court has settled the constitutional question, the practical work of designing a replacement system now falls to policymakers and political parties.

“One possibility is a system of concurrent voter and party registration. When citizens register to vote, they could simultaneously indicate their political party affiliation”.Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare, Legal Scholar and CDD-Ghana Democracy and Development Fellow

He explained that under this system, a citizen’s voter identification would then serve as their credential for participating in that party’s primary elections, eliminating the need for separate party membership registration processes.

He added that party affiliation could subsequently be updated during periodic voter registration exercises or within specific windows established ahead of primary elections.

Electoral Commission to Administer Primaries

Under Professor Asare’s proposed framework, the Electoral Commission would take on responsibility for scheduling and administering party primaries in consultation with the parties themselves, shifting the financial burden of conducting these elections from individual parties to the broader public electoral process.

Read also:

Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare
CDD-Ghana Fellow Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare

Professor Asare argued that this approach would deliver several concrete benefits for Ghana’s internal party democracy, expanding participation while reducing the outsized influence smaller delegate blocs have historically wielded over candidate selection.

“Most importantly, it would return the choice of candidates to the ordinary party member rather than to a limited electoral college. It would also provide a uniform, transparent, and independently administered process that minimizes disputes over party registers and voting procedures”.Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare, Legal Scholar and CDD-Ghana Democracy and Development Fellow

Weighing Alternative Models

Professor Asare acknowledged that other models exist, including one-member-one-vote primaries conducted using party-controlled membership registers, describing this as a potential improvement over the delegate system while flagging a significant limitation.

“If party executives retain broad discretion to admit, suspend, or recognize members, the risk is that the old electoral college simply reappears in a different guise. Instead of limiting the vote through delegates, it could be limited through control of the membership register. Internal democracy cannot depend on a membership list that can be manipulated from above”.Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare, Legal Scholar and CDD-Ghana Democracy and Development Fellow

Professor Asare argued that his proposed system would strike an important balance, preserving each party’s freedom to shape its own ideology and policies while ensuring that participation within the party rests on objective, independently verifiable criteria.

A Constitutional Conversation, Not a Closed Debate

Professor Asare was careful to note that the Supreme Court’s ruling opens a broader policy discussion rather than settling every detail of what comes next, leaving considerable room for various stakeholders to shape the eventual outcome.