Read also:
- Mahama Ayariga, Northern MPs Hold Talks with Bawku Naba to Forge Lasting Peace
- Tema Oil Refinery Back Online After Years-Long Shutdown
- Prof Prempeh Advocates for Extended Working Age for Lecturers
- Kennedy Agyapong Poised to Take on NDC, Says Aide
- Majority of Ghanaians Support Extending Presidential Term to 5 Years, Poll Suggests
Els MBN360 New
AFellow of the Centre for Democratic Development Ghana, Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare, has cautioned that political parties which abandon intellectual rigor and moral restraint place their long term survival at serious risk.
According to him, the gradual erosion of these core virtues is often the unseen force behind the loss of legitimacy and eventual collapse of political traditions.
Professor Asare argued that political scientists commonly explain the success or failure of parties through factors such as ethnicity, access to money, incumbency or propaganda. While acknowledging that these elements matter, he maintained that they do not tell the full story.
Beneath these visible drivers of political competition, he said, lies a deeper truth that is frequently ignored in public debate. The decline of intellectual seriousness and moral discipline, he contended, marks the beginning of the end for any political party.
“Political parties do not collapse first at the ballot box. They collapse in the mind and in the soul long before the votes are counted”.CDD-Ghana Fellow and legal scholar, Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare
He explained that most political movements begin with a clear diagnosis of national challenges, a coherent philosophy of governance and leaders capable of argument, persuasion and reflection. These ideas define the party’s identity and attract followers who believe in its vision.
Over time, however, Professor Asare warned that some parties stop thinking, listening, and learning. When that happens, ideas are replaced with slogans, evidence gives way to insults, and policy debate is overtaken by personality-driven politics.
He described this process as intellectual decay, a condition that weakens a party’s ability to govern effectively. According to him, once a party no longer values competence, depth or internal debate, it begins to replace thinkers with cheerleaders.
Dissenters are treated as enemies rather than contributors, and complexity is framed as betrayal. In such an environment, the party gradually loses its capacity to govern, because governance requires judgment, humility, and the ability to manage difficult trade-offs. These qualities, he argued, cannot be supplied by propaganda alone.
Professor Asare emphasises that intellectual decline on its own does not necessarily destroy a party. What ultimately finishes it, he said, is moral decay. He explained that moral virtue in politics does not demand perfection or sainthood, but rather a basic commitment to honesty, restraint, accountability and respect for public trust.
He warned that when leaders begin to excuse corruption on the grounds that it is widespread or defend wrongdoing because it benefits their own side, they quietly sever the moral bond between the party and citizens. When power is treated as entitlement rather than stewardship, trust erodes even if the party maintains short term electoral success.
Professor Asare stressed that voters are often more perceptive than political elites assume. While citizens may endure hardship or policy failure for a time, he argued that they do not indefinitely tolerate hypocrisy. Voters are able to distinguish between propaganda and policy, between ideas and insults, and between justification and genuine leadership.
He cautioned that a party that campaigns on integrity cannot survive for long if it normalises impunity. Similarly, a party that once defended democratic institutions cannot endure if it later attacks judges, auditors, journalists, or citizens who ask difficult questions.
Such actions, he noted, undermine accountability and weaken confidence in the democratic system. The CDD Ghana Fellow described it as tragic that many parties misinterpret decline as a temporary setback rather than a structural problem.
Instead of engaging in honest self-examination, they blame voter apathy, cyclical political swings, or hostile forces. Rather than reforming leadership and renewing ideas, they recycle old slogans and invent enemies, whether real or imagined.
Drawing on historical experience, Professor Asare argued that history is unforgiving to parties that abandon intellectual seriousness and moral restraint. Across different societies, he said, such parties lose legitimacy first, then credibility and eventually power.
This outcome does not occur because voters suddenly become ungrateful, but because the party forgets the purpose for which it was created. He further argued that political survival is not guaranteed by loudness, money, distortion or intimidation.
Instead, it is sustained by ideas that can withstand scrutiny and character that can withstand the temptations of power. When these foundations disappear, defeat becomes only a matter of time.
Professor Asare concluded by urging political parties, whether in government or opposition, to resist the temptation to sacrifice intellectual and moral virtues for short-term advantage. He insisted that opposition is not a licence for recklessness and that power is not an excuse for arrogance.
According to him, a party that abandons rigor while in opposition is likely to govern badly when it wins power, while a party that abandons restraint while governing will eventually be rejected.
Intellectual seriousness and moral discipline, he stressed, are not campaign tools to be deployed selectively. They are permanent conditions for political credibility and democratic survival.
