Els: MBN360 Extractives/Energy
The Chairman of the Public Interest and Accountability Committee (PIAC), Richard Ellimah, has called for stronger safeguards, broader stakeholder engagement and enhanced transparency as debate intensifies over government plans for Ghana Heritage Fund access.
Speaking at a Technical Roundtable on proposed amendments to the petroleum revenue management framework, Mr. Ellimah emphasised that decisions surrounding the Ghana Heritage Fund extend far beyond present fiscal pressures.
He argued that the implications are intergenerational and will influence how future Ghanaians judge the stewardship of today’s policymakers.
“This is the first time we are gathering as a team to critically look at an issue that does not just affect us, but our children and our grandchildren and our great-great-grandchildren.”Richard Ellimah, Chairman of PIAC
His remarks underscored the long-term orientation embedded in the original design of Ghana’s petroleum funds.
The Ghana Heritage Fund was established to preserve a portion of oil revenues for future generations, serving as a savings mechanism to ensure that non-renewable resource wealth benefits citizens long after petroleum production declines.
Any proposal to access or alter its mandate therefore raises questions about intergenerational equity and fiscal responsibility.
Public Concerns Over Petroleum Revenues

Drawing on PIAC’s nationwide public engagements, Mr. Ellimah noted that a recurring question from citizens has been how petroleum revenues are being utilised.
According to him, while Ghanaians may not always express their concerns loudly in public forums, there is a strong underlying interest in oil revenue management and its developmental impact.“The persistent question we hear is, ‘what has happened to our petroleum money?’” he stated.
He explained that this question reflects two central expectations: first, that petroleum revenues should translate into tangible improvements in livelihoods; and second, that governance of these funds must meet high standards of transparency and accountability.
These concerns, he suggested, make it imperative that any changes to the petroleum revenue framework be handled with openness and public participation.
Limited Consultation Raises Eyebrows

Mr. Ellimah disclosed that PIAC was taken aback by the government’s decision to pursue amendments to the petroleum revenue management framework without extensive stakeholder consultation.
Despite being a statutory oversight body established specifically to monitor petroleum revenue management, PIAC was not formally invited to early discussions on the proposed amendments.
Read also:
- Understanding On Main Principles Reached In Second US-Iran Talks
- Mahama Rallies Public Officials to Lead Farming Revival
- Borteyman Sports Complex is a good investment but lacks proper management- Mike Aidoo
- This crop of Black Princesses better than previous ones” – Betty Krosbi Mensah
- Court orders businessman to pay GHC200,000 for breach of promise to marry
In fact, we got to hear of the meetings through the back door,” he revealed, describing the limited engagement as inadequate given the sensitivity of the issue and the level of public interest involved.
While acknowledging that Parliament has already passed the amendments, he maintained that consultation should not end with legislative approval.
Instead, he called for continued dialogue to ensure that implementation aligns with national development priorities and public expectations.
Outlining PIAC’s position, Mr. Ellimah emphasised the need to safeguard the interests of future generations in line with the Heritage Fund’s founding objectives.
He argued that petroleum revenues represent finite resources, and their management must reflect prudence and foresight.
He also stressed the importance of enhanced transparency and accountability, particularly in areas where ministerial discretion may apply in determining how funds are invested or utilised.
Call for Comprehensive Reform Approach

Mr. Ellimah further advocated for a more holistic approach to reforming the Petroleum Revenue Management Act rather than frequent piecemeal amendments.
He argued that a comprehensive review process would have ensured wider stakeholder buy-in and reduced the need for repeated legislative changes within a short timeframe.
Such an approach, he suggested, would strengthen policy coherence and reinforce the credibility of Ghana’s petroleum revenue governance framework.
The Technical Roundtable, jointly organised by PIAC and the National Resource Governance Institute (NRGI), provided a platform for stakeholders to deliberate on these concerns and chart a path forward.
As Ghana navigates fiscal pressures and development demands, the debate over Ghana Heritage Fund access highlights the delicate balance between addressing present needs and preserving future security.
For PIAC’s leadership, the message is clear: reforms must not compromise the original purpose of the fund. Instead, they should reinforce transparency, strengthen oversight and maintain public trust.
Mr. Ellimah’s intervention signals that even as legislative processes move forward, the conversation around petroleum revenue management remains active. Ultimately, how Ghana manages its oil wealth today will shape not only economic outcomes but also the legacy left for generations yet to come.