Els: MBN360 News
Desmond Israel, Head of Public Law and Governance, says Ghana’s laws are explicit: the non-consensual sharing of intimate images is a criminal offence and offenders can face jail time.
Israel described the alleged circulation of explicit videos involving Ghanaian women as “clearly criminal,” stressing that both constitutional privacy rights and statutory protections have likely been violated.
“A crime has been committed against citizens of Ghana,” he said. “We have a law that prohibits the non-consensual sharing of explicit materials. Beyond that, there are civil breaches relating to privacy and data protection.”
He cited the Cybersecurity Act, 2020, particularly Section 67, which criminalises the distribution of intimate content without consent and carries a possible prison term of up to three years.
Importantly, Israel explained that consent to recording does not automatically amount to consent to publication.
“You may agree to a video being recorded, but the law requires additional consent before it can be shared. Without that, it becomes an offence,” he noted.
Read also:
- ECG Announces Planned Power Outages Across Four Regions
- GNFS confirms six deaths, seven injured in Accra-Nsawam highway petrol tanker fire
- Moon sighting for Ramadan 2026 set for February 18 – Office of Chief Imam
- GPL 2025/26: Kotoko title hopes dented after Hearts of Oak loss – Interim coach.
- Black Princesses edge South Africa 1-0 to keep U-20 World Cup dream alive.
Jurisdiction challenges
Addressing reports that the prime suspect is outside Ghana, Israel said criminal jurisdiction is usually territorial, but international cooperation mechanisms such as extradition treaties and Interpol notices could be explored.
However, he cautioned that extradition is complex and heavily influenced by diplomacy and constitutional provisions in the suspect’s home country.
“It’s not as easy as people think. Even when you secure arrest notices, geopolitical relationships can affect enforcement,” he explained.
Still, he said Ghana could legally try a suspect in absentia.
“If convicted, that judgment follows the person for life. Years later, if they enter a cooperating jurisdiction, the sentence can still be enforced.”
He urged authorities to pursue prosecution to deter similar offences and protect victims’ rights.
